Towards a Taxonomy for Evaluating User Engagement in Information Visualization

نویسندگان

  • Narges Mahyar
  • Sung-Hee Kim
  • Bum Chul Kwon
چکیده

Nowadays, with the availability of massive amounts of personal data, the role of Information Visualization is getting more and more important. There are a lot of visualization and visual analytics tools to help people to make sense of their personal data in their everyday lives. There is a consensus in the visualization community about the importance of user engagement for personal visual analytics. However, there are many challenges associated with this topic. As of yet, there is no clear and widely accepted definition for user engagement. Consequently and despite some recent efforts, there are no systematic and unified methods for evaluating different aspects of user engagement. In this paper, we bring attention to some fundamental open issues in the context of Information Visualization: What is the definition of engagement? What are the levels of engagement? How to measure engagement? How to improve user engagement level? This research is an initial attempt towards addressing some of these issues. Our main goal is to enable visualization researchers to more accurately measure and evaluate user engagement with visualizations. To this end, we reviewed definitions, measures, and frameworks from various other disciplines and specified the gap in the visualization community. We propose a five level taxonomy for engagement which is deeply inspired by Boloom’s Taxonomy. In addition, we address some important open questions that require further exploration. This paper establishes a groundwork for future research in user engagement with visualizations.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Delving Into the Details of Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”

Initiatives to engage the public in health policy decisions have been widely endorsed and used, yet agreed upon methods for systematically evaluating the effectiveness of these initiatives remain to be developed. Dukhanin, Topazian, and DeCamp have thus developed a useful taxonomy of evaluation criteria derived from a systematic review of published evaluation tools that might serve as the basis...

متن کامل

Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

Background Patient, public, consumer, and community (P2C2) engagement in organization-, community-, and systemlevel healthcare decision-making is increasing globally, but its formal evaluation remains challenging. To define a taxonomy of possible P2C2 engagement metrics and compare existing evaluation tools against this taxonomy, we conducted a systematic review.   Methods A broad search strate...

متن کامل

دیداری کردن نتایج جست‌وجو در فرایند بازیابی اطلاعات

Purpose: One of the most effective ways to achieve optimum information retrieval is through visualization of Information. Search strategies, probing skills, querying of information needs and analysis of information play a significant role in the accessing of necessary and useful information. Besides the factors mentioned above, information visualization can increase the availability level of in...

متن کامل

Design and Evaluation of the Tightly Coupled Perceptual-Cognitive Tasks in Knowledge Domain Visualization

Knowledge Domain Visualization (KDViz) aims to reveal the dynamics of how knowledge domains evolve over time. It is the ultimate role for information visualization to facilitate a wide variety of user tasks associated with the study of such dynamic, large-scale, transient, and self-organized phenomena. Since the evolution of knowledge domain is necessarily influenced by an array of factors, the...

متن کامل

Using Extended Abstract Tasks for Evaluating Visual User-Interfaces

The evaluation of visual user-interfaces (VUI) has to cope with various methodological challenges like choosing the right evaluation technique, using suitable task taxonomies, and avoiding „fishing for results”. A general problem is the absence of validated orientation systems at an appropriate abstraction level. This paper describes an evaluation of information visualization based on a process...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015